http://paulseaman.eu/2008/11/obamas-good-old-fashioned-use-of-tv/ I am a PR and love my trade. Nevertheless PR requires a reality check. We're about helping clients speak honestly, even robustly. People who run things have a lot of explaining to do in the next few years, so PR is crucial. I want a lively debate and I hope you’ll make it so. Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:07:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://paulseaman.eu/2008/11/obamas-good-old-fashioned-use-of-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-3222 Stockholm Accords interrogated – part 1 | 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review Sun, 02 May 2010 20:14:06 +0000 http://paulseaman.eu/?p=271#comment-3222 [...] commentators claimed. Even there it still played second fiddle to mainstream media, as demonstrated here. It is worth noting that the US-experience was a temporary one-off. There’s no relationship [...] [...] commentators claimed. Even there it still played second fiddle to mainstream media, as demonstrated here. It is worth noting that the US-experience was a temporary one-off. There’s no relationship [...]

]]> http://paulseaman.eu/2008/11/obamas-good-old-fashioned-use-of-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-11 Alan Brighty Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:32:40 +0000 http://paulseaman.eu/?p=271#comment-11 How democratic, decentralised and interactive are $100 million worth of promises made to attract campaign funds? Five million people raising $20 a time is fine but I don't kid miyself that most of the money was raised in this way. The majority of the funds came from big donations, They will be expecting big favours in return. Time alone will tell what those favours are. How democratic, decentralised and interactive are $100 million worth of promises made to attract campaign funds? Five million people raising $20 a time is fine but I don’t kid miyself that most of the money was raised in this way. The majority of the funds came from big donations, They will be expecting big favours in return. Time alone will tell what those favours are.

]]>