<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @PressReleasePR &amp; @Twitter ilk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/</link>
	<description>Welcome to Paul Seaman’s blog. I am a PR and love my trade - challenging it too. PR needs a reality check. We&#039;re about helping clients speak honestly, even robustly. People who run things have a lot of explaining to do in the next few years, so PR is crucial.  I want a lively debate and I hope you’ll make it so.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: injeniacimafe</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>injeniacimafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=1697#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Maaaan, you know there is such thing in the web like search engine, http://google.com if you don&#039;t, go there to understand why this post is bullshit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maaaan, you know there is such thing in the web like search engine, <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">http://google.com</a> if you don&#8217;t, go there to understand why this post is bullshit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Seaman</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Seaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=1697#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Dear Judy,

Thanks for the supportive comments. I admire http://www.prconversations.com because it provides an open forum for different viewpoints on PR. It provides a great environment to share test and explore ideas with fellow professionals. I like the broad scope of the material published. I love the sometimes sharp differences of opinion expressed on challenging issues. I warm also to the tone of discussion which is respectful, serious and professional. A rare Web PR gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Judy,</p>
<p>Thanks for the supportive comments. I admire <a href="http://www.prconversations.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.prconversations.com</a> because it provides an open forum for different viewpoints on PR. It provides a great environment to share test and explore ideas with fellow professionals. I like the broad scope of the material published. I love the sometimes sharp differences of opinion expressed on challenging issues. I warm also to the tone of discussion which is respectful, serious and professional. A rare Web PR gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Gombita</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Gombita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=1697#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

I originally visited 21st Century PR Issues because our group blog, PR Conversations (http://www.prconversations.com), isgetting so many hits from here. Wandering around, I discovered this post.

I&#039;ve been experimenting with twitter, first as a travel microblog, with a twitmoniker only (i.e., not my real name) and &quot;publicity&quot; about its existence solely directed to family, colleagues and friends, who knew I was going on an extended trip to Australia. The interesting thing was that I kept picking up followers (mainly people I didn&#039;t have a prior relationship with), I can only assume based on what I tweeted. Many were from the country I was visiting (Oz), others were travel enthusiasts/bloggers, film buffs, some activists (e.g., when I tweeted about attending a book reading with Mamdouh Habib), etc.

Even though I returned home more than a month ago, I&#039;ve kept up the account to see whether it is a worthwhile endeavour. I agree with you that twitter&#039;s greatest legitimacy/validity is the information-sharing aspect. I&#039;ve recently begun following such &quot;institutions&quot; on twitter as the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the National Film Board and the Canadian Journalism Foundation. Quite frankly, I get more useful/interesting/timely information from these twitter streams than at least 80 per cent of the content from individuals I follow (and currently I am following fewer than 100).

Twitter is still proving to be an interesting channel to participate in and observe as a *starting point* for information and &quot;relationships.* But I&#039;m on your side that it definitely isn&#039;t going to replace other forms of interaction (online or off) that hold more depth and promise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>I originally visited 21st Century PR Issues because our group blog, PR Conversations (<a href="http://www.prconversations.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.prconversations.com</a>), isgetting so many hits from here. Wandering around, I discovered this post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been experimenting with twitter, first as a travel microblog, with a twitmoniker only (i.e., not my real name) and &#8220;publicity&#8221; about its existence solely directed to family, colleagues and friends, who knew I was going on an extended trip to Australia. The interesting thing was that I kept picking up followers (mainly people I didn&#8217;t have a prior relationship with), I can only assume based on what I tweeted. Many were from the country I was visiting (Oz), others were travel enthusiasts/bloggers, film buffs, some activists (e.g., when I tweeted about attending a book reading with Mamdouh Habib), etc.</p>
<p>Even though I returned home more than a month ago, I&#8217;ve kept up the account to see whether it is a worthwhile endeavour. I agree with you that twitter&#8217;s greatest legitimacy/validity is the information-sharing aspect. I&#8217;ve recently begun following such &#8220;institutions&#8221; on twitter as the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the National Film Board and the Canadian Journalism Foundation. Quite frankly, I get more useful/interesting/timely information from these twitter streams than at least 80 per cent of the content from individuals I follow (and currently I am following fewer than 100).</p>
<p>Twitter is still proving to be an interesting channel to participate in and observe as a *starting point* for information and &#8220;relationships.* But I&#8217;m on your side that it definitely isn&#8217;t going to replace other forms of interaction (online or off) that hold more depth and promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversation Is Good &#124; danny brown</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversation Is Good &#124; danny brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=1697#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] the end of it. Except Paul feels his reputation is being questioned, and has written another post responding to the comments made on Twitter and a blog post by Jeff over at Swatting At Flies. Now normally I&#8217;d respond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the end of it. Except Paul feels his reputation is being questioned, and has written another post responding to the comments made on Twitter and a blog post by Jeff over at Swatting At Flies. Now normally I&#8217;d respond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nesjo@yahoo.com</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/pressreleasepr-and-ilk/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>nesjo@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=1697#comment-20</guid>
		<description>@ you tweeters: there&#039;s an old saying that if you give enough monkeys enough typewriters - ahem PCs with Microsoft(TM) Office (R) 2007 on them - that they&#039;ll eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare. And a hell of a lot of crap as well.

I agree with Mr Seaman. The cream will rise to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ you tweeters: there&#8217;s an old saying that if you give enough monkeys enough typewriters &#8211; ahem PCs with Microsoft(TM) Office (R) 2007 on them &#8211; that they&#8217;ll eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare. And a hell of a lot of crap as well.</p>
<p>I agree with Mr Seaman. The cream will rise to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
