<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you trust a trust survey?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/</link>
	<description>I am a PR and love my trade. Nevertheless PR requires a reality check. We&#039;re about helping clients speak honestly, even robustly. People who run things have a lot of explaining to do in the next few years, so PR is crucial. I want a lively debate and I hope you’ll make it so.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essay: A new moral agenda for PR &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman&#039;s online review</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>Essay: A new moral agenda for PR &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman&#039;s online review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=2115#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>[...] Edelman&#8217;s Trust Barometer conclusions, and in initiatives such as the Stockholm Accords (see here here here here and here). It is an outlook which pretends that all stakeholders are equal. It is an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edelman&#8217;s Trust Barometer conclusions, and in initiatives such as the Stockholm Accords (see here here here here and here). It is an outlook which pretends that all stakeholders are equal. It is an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trusted Advisor &#187; Realms of Trust and Manifestations of Trust</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-7931</link>
		<dc:creator>Trusted Advisor &#187; Realms of Trust and Manifestations of Trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=2115#comment-7931</guid>
		<description>[...] Seaman&#8217;s review of the Edelman Trust Surveys (Would you trust a trust survey?) does a nice job of taking apart the apparent meaning of trust survey data.&#160; A small example: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seaman&rsquo;s review of the Edelman Trust Surveys (Would you trust a trust survey?) does a nice job of taking apart the apparent meaning of trust survey data.&nbsp; A small example: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wither stakeholder doctrine? &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman&#39;s online review</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Wither stakeholder doctrine? &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman&#39;s online review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=2115#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, stakeholders like publics are often found in more than one role. Employees can be shareholders, customers can be activists, suppliers might be creditors etc. Their interests might be contradictory in the different roles they occupy. Moreover, the stakeholder’s perception of his or her own interest might not be measurable clearly either by consultation and or research (that’s an issue I’ve looked on my PR blog in relation to the Edelman trust survey results here here here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, stakeholders like publics are often found in more than one role. Employees can be shareholders, customers can be activists, suppliers might be creditors etc. Their interests might be contradictory in the different roles they occupy. Moreover, the stakeholder’s perception of his or her own interest might not be measurable clearly either by consultation and or research (that’s an issue I’ve looked on my PR blog in relation to the Edelman trust survey results here here here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Would you trust a trust survey? &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Would you trust a trust survey? &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulseaman.eu/?p=2115#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by paulseaman and paulseaman, paulseaman. paulseaman said: @saleemkhan please report on this http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by paulseaman and paulseaman, paulseaman. paulseaman said: @saleemkhan please report on this <a href="http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/" rel="nofollow">http://paulseaman.eu/2009/01/would-you-trust-a-trust-survey/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

