Categories: Media issues / Trust and reputations
12 July 2010
Google comes of age in China
‘Do No Evil’ Google has, rightly, returned to China. However, Google was also right when it withdrew because its reputation and survival were at stake.
The hacking of Google email accounts and the stealing of its worldwide log-in authentication code for every Google service, presumably by the Chinese military, threatened the brand’s core being. That’s because Google’s shareholder value depends on a combination of intellectual property and public trust, based on the exploitation of a worldwide web infrastructure it does not own or control. What’s more, Google can only optimise its money-making if its users divvy up more of their privacy in exchange for its world of “Free”.
So the pull-out from China was never about money. It was never about Google’s failure to gain market share in China. Neither was it about defending the right to the free flow of information or the freedom of speech. Google withdrew its co-operation with the Chinese government’s censorship of the internet in retaliation at the hacking of its users’ emails and the theft of the company’s property.
If Google’s users cannot rely on the privacy and security of the firm’s platforms, applications and services, then Google does not have a sustainable business model.
Google’s return to China – like its entry in to the market – comes with the implicit acceptance, however reluctantly conceded, that the government there has the right to restrict access to internet content. This time around, Google simply relocated its servers securely in Hong Kong. It has allowed the Great Firewall of China to censor access to them. It is a pragmatic compromise. As the BBC points out:
“The battle between Google and the Chinese government appears to have ended in a score-draw.”
Of course, Google’s reputation remains a victim of its split personality. On the one hand, the company was built on the premise of an ambiguous “Do No Evil” slogan and on the utopian notion of enabling unhindered free flow of data and information across the web. On the other, Google has always been a profit-driven, share-price sensitive animal, which pushes it to be pragmatic and not to be overly ideological in practice.
The latest development in China highlights how Google is growing up fast. It reveals a company which is learning how to keep hold of its integrity and USPs while remaining sensitive to the real-world forces and issues, many of which it is not in a position to influence. Nevertheless, Google has been scoring some own goals recently. One example was Google Buzz, which failed partly because its clumsy “auto-following contacts” in Gmail upset users. Another was the wifi privacy intrusions by Google’s mapping vehicles.
The PR challenge now for Google is to convince a sceptical world that it can be trusted long term with our personal and social networking details, viewing habits, interests and data. It’s my view that unless Google handles privacy issues well it will be replaced by the next big competitor that comes along. However, the news from China suggests that a grown up Google might survive into old age.
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shonali Burke and paulseaman. paulseaman said: On my PR blog now: Google comes of age in China http://ow.ly/2a5fT @google […]
Evil is a relative thing, China is not a democracy, but look what happened to Russia when it liberalized itself: meltdown. Democracy works when institutions are strong. China is no different to Russia and so going down the third way of unleashing capitalism while keeping an iron grip on internal affairs is the best route for the medium term. Yes there are problems with Tiananmen square, Falun gong etc. but it is far better than the mess that it could be.
Within that situation and suspicion of foreign monopolies and the elite’s fear of political implosion you cannot expect anything other than the crass handed way that they dealt with Google, where nearly all the state bureaucracy were brought up with a cold war mentality. China was not doing evil, it was in its mind protecting itself. It needs to adjust it opinion on what is a threat and what is not, and that unfortunately could take a very long time.
On this specific point, if the Chinese rescinded Google’s operating license, it would have caused big headaches politically with the US who are suffering with their massive trade deficit, and perceived Chinese currency manipulations. It is good that cooler heads prevailed.
Lots of websites are blocked in China and the list keeps changing from day to day. To keep updated with which they are, check out http://www.greatfirewall.biz
BTW: Spiked-online is holding a four-week online debate on Google and the issue of privacy. The latest contribution is by Tory MP Robert Halfon who argues that we need to stop internet companies from creating their own surveillance society. Anyway, the debate for and against Google can be reviewed here:
[…] of nation states, it ceases to be a viable business. That’s a challenge I examined in Google comes of Age in China, where I pointed out how Google’s idealism is tempered by its dependence on access to an […]
[…] Of course, one could argue that in China PR firms mostly represent Chinese companies, rather than the state. Except that would be dishonest. In China the state owns most major companies and still commands the economy. It also gets its claws, admittedly indirectly, into the Western firms which operate there. (See Google comes of age in China.) […]